View and/or print RFP and forms [pdf files]
RFP body
Operating Board
Current and Pending Support
Collaborating Company Intellectual Property Agreement
Terms and Conditions
Personnel Changes for CASI Projects


REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

COLORADO ADVANCED SOFTWARE INSTITUTE

FY03 Technology Transfer Grant Program
October 1, 2001

Proposal Deadline: January 11, 2002
Announcement of Selection for Award: March 25, 2002

The Colorado Advanced Software Institute (CASI) promotes the development of technology and human resources in advanced software for Colorado business and industry. One way CASI achieves this is through the funding of relevant, small-scale projects to university faculty that facilitate the transfer of software technology between universities and industry.

The CASI technology transfer concept: University/industry collaboration that realizes both research interest for a university and practical value for a company.

SUGGESTED TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER TOPICS

Technology Transfer Collaborative Opportunity descriptions in software technology suggested for funding in FY03 may be found in Attachment 1. Other software technology collaborative opportunities will be considered. It is up to the party interested in a research abstract to contact the author of the research abstract.

PROJECT DURATION

CASI will fund either one- or two-year projects. All projects must begin no later than August 20, 2002, to ensure a full 12 months of research. A one-year project's maximum period of funding in FY02 is July 1, 2002, to August 31, 2003, and may begin as early as July 1, if the enabling documentation is complete by that time. A two-year project's maximum period of funding is July 1, 2002, to August 31, 2004. Proposals for one- or two-year segments of larger, multi-year research streams are welcomed. However, such proposals should describe the larger research context and show how the proposed work is bounded within it. CASI funding is expected to lead to follow-on funding from the private sector or from federal programs.

BUDGET

Maximum budget is unlimited, however the required cost share will be based on the first $40,000 of the budget. Any amount over $40,000 will be paid solely by the collaborating company. Principal investigators are urged to keep costs minimal. Maximum faculty support is two month's salary per year or a one-course buy-out during the academic year. Purpose of travel must be stated. Equipment budget must be itemized and justified. If a faculty member is granted more than one award, CASI will adjust the salary budget accordingly.

As guidance, the following formula is typical of many CASI-funded one-year projects: one- or two-months faculty support; 12 months of 20-hours-per-week graduate student support with 40 hours per week in the summer preferred; tuition (private, in-state or out-of-state); and other direct costs, such as computer time.

FOLLOW-ON FUNDING REQUIREMENT

As mentioned above, CASI funding is expected to lead to follow-on funding from the private sector or from federal programs. To this end, the proposal must contain the general outline of a plan to obtain additional funding and the amount to be sought. One of the project deliverables must be the proposal for additional funding. The project budget may contain up to ten percent of its total amount for efforts related to securing additional funding. Ten percent of the project funds will be withheld until a copy of the follow-on funding proposal submitted to the federal or private agency is received by CASI.

COLLABORATING COMPANIES

Each proposal must involve the participation of a member business, industry, or public entity participant, called the Collaborating Company. The Collaborating Company may be a single firm or group of firms, a single public entity or group of public entities.

A Collaborating company may be:

Collaborating companies of type (a) and (b) have full voting rights on the CASI Operating Board and their proposal processing fee is paid from membership dues. Collaborating companies of type (c) do not have any voting rights on the CASI Operating Board and must become dues paying members if the project is funded.

The principal investigator of a CASI grant shall not also be a principal of the Collaborating Company, where "principal" is defined as a corporate officer of the company.

Membership. CASI has five membership levels. Each level is related to the number of employees in the state of Colorado:

Membership
Level

Employees in Colorado

Membership Dues

1

£ 25

$950

2

£ 100

$1,950

3

£ 300

$2,950

4

£ 950

$3,950

5

> 950

$4,950

State of Colorado Institutions have no membership fee. National Government Institutions and Local Communal Organizations membership fees are based on the number of employees in the state of Colorado.

New members are welcome. For more information concerning membership, please contact the CASI Director or CASI Coordinator's Office. A list of current members is included in Attachment 2 of this RFP.

Cost Sharing. CASI requires cost sharing by Collaborating Companies in support of the Technology Transfer projects. Collaborating Companies cost share according to the percentage indicated by their level of membership. The cost share is based upon the total grant budget. The Collaborating Company's cost-sharing portion must be paid to CASI and NOT to the principal investigators nor to their universities. Payment is due at CASI on June 20, 2002. The project will receive no funding commitment until CASI receives the cost-sharing funds from the Collaborating Company.

Membership Level

Cost Share

1

10%

2

20%

3

30%

4

40%

5

50%

The cost share required from State of Colorado Institutions, National Government Institutions and Local Communal Organizations is based on their number of employees.

WAIVER OF INDIRECT COSTS

The budget must exclude indirect costs. Because CASI grants are funded largely with monies from the Colorado Advanced Technology Institute, all indirect costs must be waived by the institution.

PROJECT STAFFING. All funded projects will include the following staffing:

University faculty member. Only full-time, tenure-track faculty at the member universities are eligible to apply for funding from CASI. As principal investigator of a CASI grant, the faculty member has the technical and contractual responsibility for acceptable and timely completion of the work proposed in accordance with the standard contracts and grants policy of the faculty member's university.

Graduate student, Postdoctoral Student, or Professional Research Assistant. Ideally, one or more graduate students are supported by the project. However, a postdoctoral student or a Professional Research Assistant may be more appropriate for some projects. At a minimum, the student should be supported half-time (20 hours / week for 12 months). If the company has restrictions on the type of student to be hired (e.g. only US Citizens and permanent residents), this must be clearly stated and justified in the proposal. The principal investigator is responsible for personnel and project management to ensure that the project is successfully carried out.

Collaborating business, industry or public entity. Each project must involve a scientist, technician, subject-matter expert, or management representative from the member Collaborating Company.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The intellectual property created in the course of the performance of work within the scope and time period, including any time extensions, of a CASI Technology Transfer project is the property of the university to which the grant is awarded. Licensure of intellectual property is governed by the Collaborating Company Intellectual Property Agreement and the Terms and Conditions, Attachments 4 and 5 of this RFP. The principal investigator is required to file an Intellectual Property Disclosure form with CASI as an attachment to the Final Report. Ten percent of the project funds will be withheld until the form is submitted.

PROPOSAL FORMAT [Proposals not following the format will not be considered - adopted from NSF guidelines]

Proposal Margin and Spacing Requirements.

1) Proposals must have a minimum 0.75 inch margins at the top, bottom and on each side.

2) The type size must be clear and readily legible, and conform to the following three requirements:

  • the height of the letters must not be smaller than 10 point
  • type density must be no more than 15 characters per 2.5 cm; (for proportional spacing, the average for any representative section of text must not exceed 15 characters per 2.5 cm
  • no more than 6 lines must be within a vertical space of 2.5 cm. The type size used throughout the proposal must conform to all three requirements. While line spacing (single-spaced, double-spaced, etc.) is at the discretion of the proposer, established page limits must be followed.


While the guidelines specified above establish the minimum type size requirements, PIs are advised that readability is of paramount importance and should take precedence in selection of an appropriate font for use in the proposal.

Cover Page. Must contain the following information in this order: project title; project duration (one or two years); amount requested; participating university and department; name, title, address, phone number, and e-mail address of the faculty member; name, title, address, phone number, and e-mail address (if available) of the collaborating business representative; and a 100-word abstract.

Required Sections of Body. Maximum page length: 5 pages, excluding references.: NOTE The elements listed in the Proposal Evaluation section below should serve as guidance in the preparation of these sections of the body. Please note that the text provided in each section should pertain to that section and only that section.

Problem, Background, or Opportunity. Suggested length, 1/2 page.

Objective. What is the intended outcome of this work? Identify any deliverables beyond the required reports. Suggested length, 1/2 page.

Potential for Broad-based Technology Transfer. Suggested length, 1/2 page.

Approach. What methodology is to be employed? What is the detailed, step-by-step plan for achieving the objective? Suggested length, 3 pages. For 2 year projects, scope of work for each year must be clearly identified.

Resources. What equipment, software, data, knowledge or other resources are required to achieve your objective, and how are you going to have access to those resources? Suggested length, 1/2 page.

Evaluation Plan. How will you assess whether the objective has been satisfactorily met?

Follow-on Funding Plan. Plan to obtain follow-on funding and the amount to be requested.

Appendices to Proposal

  1. Vitae. One-page summary vitae for the faculty member, graduate student (optional), and representative of the Collaborating Company.
  2. Principal Investigator Disclosure. The principal investigator's statement as to his/her relationship, if any, to the Collaborating Company.
  3. Budget & Budget Justification. NOTE: Indirect costs must be waived by the university.
  4. Completed Current and Pending Support Form. Disclosure of current and pending funding. (Attachment 3.)
  5. Signed Terms and Conditions. Signature is required only for the principal investigator at the time of proposal submission. (Attachment 5).
  6. Signed Collaborating Company Intellectual Property Agreement. Only the original CASI Intellectual Property Agreement (Attachment 4) may be submitted. Any changes in the Rights of Collaborating Company section must be negotiated with the appropriate university's Intellectual Property officer. Wording on the CASI document must be crossed out and the new wording attached as a separate page. That page must be signed by for the university Intellectual Property officer. Any other changes to the document must be negotiated with CASI through contact with the CASI director.
  7. Collaborating Company Letter. Letter of intent to participate and commitment to cost share. The letter needs to be on company letterhead and signed. It must include:
  • a statement of amount of cost-sharing to be contributed to the project
  • a statement of any proprietary information existing prior to the project that is to be protected from publication in the six-month or final reports
  • a dollar quantitative estimate of the in-kind contribution to be expected. In-kind contributions include any contribution made by the company to the project of associated resources (including time of the individual representing the Collaborating Company, donation of hardware, software, data or knowledge, use of space, or other resources)

NO OTHER APPENDICES ARE PERMITTED.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF COLLABORATING COMPANY

The Collaborating Company is required to sign a release for distribution statement on any project report. It must also provide to CASI an In-kind Contribution Report in April that states the amount of their in-kind contributions for the period of the award.

PROPOSAL EVALUATION

Proposals will be evaluated by the CASI Operating Board with respect to their merit as a university/industry collaboration that realizes both research interest for a university and practical value for a company.

The proposed work must stand on its own both technically and financially, and it must be feasible to accomplish it within the scope of the funding requested.

The existence of related but separately funded research will be considered favorably in the evaluation of proposals. However, independently funded work contingent on the award of a CASI grant to a researcher will have no bearing in proposal evaluation.

Review Criteria

Problem or Opportunity

Importance of problem or opportunity to Colorado industry.
Potential of problem or opportunity to further research.

Objective Projects should have realizable, achievable objectives. Clarity of objective. The degree to which the objective addresses the problem or opportunity cited.

Potential for Broad-based Technology Transfer The degree to which the achievement of the objective advances technology transfer in both directions (researcher to company and vice versa). The broadness of the range of application if objective is accomplished.

Approach The appropriateness of software technology in the chosen approach. The degree to which the approach accomplishes the objective. The clarity of the delineation of the steps in the approach. The technical merit and of the approach. The innovativeness of the approach. The feasibility of the effort within the time and budget constraints. The degree to which the company is involved.

Evaluation Plan Adequacy of the evaluation plan assessment criteria.

Follow-on Funding Outline of planned approach Tentative amount to be sought

Resources The adequacy of the facilities.

Qualifications of Personnel The qualifications of the principal investigator to conduct the project. The appropriateness of the cooperating company representative in light of the proposed project.

Review Process

The CASI Operating Board may use a pre-screening process to reduce the number of proposals to be reviewed. For each remaining proposal, normally four written evaluations are prepared, two by university representatives and two by business representatives on the Operating Board. Copies of these evaluations will be sent to the proposer and the Collaborating Company prior to award selection. The proposal and reviews form the basis for individual Operating Board member decisions regarding which projects to support. Campus Representatives on the Operating Board are eligible to submit proposals. Each Board member (from each campus and from each business) will nominate for award as many proposals as there are projects expected to be funded. Those proposals receiving the most nominations up to the number of proposals that can be funded are those that are awarded funding.

PAYMENT UPON AWARD

All proposers will be notified in late April 2002 whether or not they have been selected for award. For both one- and two-year awards, funding commitments for FY03 funds will be sent to campus contracts officers in June 2002. For two-year awards, funding commitments for the second year is subject to approval by the CASI Board in Spring 2003 and availability of funds which cannot be committed before July 2003. No award shall receive a funding commitment until cost-sharing funds have been received by CASI. No award shall receive a funding commitment until cost-sharing funds have been received by CASI and all forms have been duly executed, including current versions of the Intellectual Property Agreement [Attachment 4] and the Terms and Conditions form [Attachment 5].

If a PI becomes ineligible, the project is cancelled unless an eligible PI can be found and approved by the collaborating company, CASI and the university involved to replace him or her. Hardship on the student(s) should be avoided. See CASI policy "PERSONNEL CHANGES for CASI PROJECTS".

 

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

Proposals must arrive at the CASI Coordinator's office by 5:00 p.m., Friday, January 12, 2001. All proposals must be approved for submission by the submitting university's office of grants and contracts. A single-sided original and thirty double-sided copies of the proposal must be submitted. Single-sided copies will not be accepted.

Note: Only the original Collaborating Company Intellectual Property Agreement (Attachment 4) and the Terms and Conditions (Attachment 5) need to be submitted. Copies are not required.

In addition to the proposal, the proposal abstract must be submitted electronically to srogers@casi.org. The abstract will be placed on CASI's web page. The abstract will be used in the review process by operating board representatives to determine whether their business or university has the expertise to review the proposal.

CASI Coordinator's Office
Department of Computer Science
601 S. Howes Street
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523-1873

ATTACHMENTS TO THIS RFP

  1. Collaborative Research Opportunities
  2. CASI Membership and CASI Staff Roster
  3. Current and Pending Support
  4. Collaborating Company Intellectual Property Agreement
  5. Terms and Conditions
  6. Personnel Changes for CASI Projects

Back to home page.

© Colorado Advanced Software Institute 1997
5/Oct/01      by   CASI Coordinator