
UNSOLICITED TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROPOSALS
COLORADO ADVANCED SOFTWARE INSTITUTE
Technology Transfer Grant Program
View or print
RFP with attachments in pdf format
Proposal Due Date: Proposal may be submitted at any time
Corporate Documents Deadline: At time of proposal submission
Announcement of Selection for Award: Two months from receipt of proposal
The Colorado Advanced Software Institute (CASI) promotes the development of technology and
human resources in advanced software for Colorado business and industry. One way CASI achieves
this is through the funding of relevant, small-scale projects to university faculty that facilitate the
transfer of software technology between universities and industry.
The CASI technology transfer concept: University/industry collaboration that realizes both
research interest for a university and practical value for a company.
Unsolicited Technology Transfer Proposals (UTT)
In cases where there is an urgent research need that cannot be accommodated by CASI's normal
Technology Transfer Grant cycle, CASI will accept proposals that have full monetary support for direct costs
from the Collaborating Company. Unsolicited Technology Transfer (UTT) proposals may be submitted to
CASI at any time during the year. The CASI director should be notified of the intent to submit one month
before proposal submittal. If approved for funding, the university at which the research will be conducted will
waive indirect costs.
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER TOPICS CONSIDERED FOR FUNDING:
Technology transfer topics in advanced software technology that satisfy CASI's technology transfer concept
stated above will be considered for funding.
PROJECT DURATION:
CASI will sponsor either one- or two-year UTT projects.
BUDGET
Maximum budget is unlimited, however principal investigators are urged to keep costs minimal. Maximum faculty support is two month's salary per year or a one-course buy-out during the academic year. Purpose of travel must be stated. Equipment budget must be itemized and justified.
COLLABORATING COMPANIES
The business(es) or public entity(ties) supporting the UTT proposal must be a CASI member at the time
of proposal submission and will be called the Collaborating Company. The principal investigator of a
CASI grant shall not also be a principal of the Collaborating Company, where "principal" is defined as a
corporate officer of the company.
CASI has five membership levels. Each level is related to the number of employees in the state of Colorado:
|
Membership
Level |
Employees in Colorado |
Membership Dues |
|
1 |
£ 25 |
$950 |
|
2 |
£ 100 |
$1,950 |
|
3 |
£ 300 |
$2,950 |
|
4 |
£ 950 |
$3,950 |
|
5 |
> 950 |
$4,950 |
State of Colorado Institutions have no membership fee. National Institutions and Local Organizations membership fees are based on the number of employees in the state of Colorado.
New members are welcome. For more information concerning membership, please contact the CASI Director or CASI Coordinator's Office.
FUNDING REQUIREMENT
CASI requires full support of direct costs for the project by the Collaborating Company in UTT projects.
The Collaborating Company's support must be paid to CASI and NOT to the principal investigators or to
their university. Payment is due at CASI before the begin date of the project. The research cannot
begin until CASI receives the funds for support of the project.
The final ten (10) percent of the grant award amount will be withheld from the grantee's campus until all
reports (both formal and informal) have been received and accepted by the CASI director.
WAIVER OF INDIRECT COSTS
The budget must exclude indirect costs. All indirect cost overhead must be waived by the institution.
PROJECT STAFFING. All UTT projects will include the following staffing:
- University faculty member. Only faculty of the member universities are eligible to submit UTT proposals to CASI. As principal investigator of a CASI grant, the faculty member has the technical and contractual responsibility for acceptable and timely completion of the work proposed in accordance with the standard contracts and grants policy of the faculty member's university.
- Graduate student, Postdoctoral Student, or Professional Research Assistant. Ideally, one or more graduate students are supported by the project; however, a postdoctoral student or a Professional Research Assistant better staffs some projects. The total aggregate of support of twenty hours per week throughout the entire 12 months of the project is regarded as a minimum. The principal investigator has the full responsibility in the area of personnel and project management to ensure that the project is successfully carried out with the staff employed.
- Collaborating business, industry or public entity. Each project must involve a scientist, technician, subject-matter expert, or management representative from the member Collaborating Company.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The intellectual property created in the course of the performance of work within the scope and time
period, including any time extensions, of a CASI Technology Transfer project is the property of the
university to which the grant is awarded. Licensure of intellectual property is governed by CASI's
current fiscal year Collaborating Company Intellectual Property Agreement
and the UTT Terms and Conditions. The principal investigator is required to file an Intellectual Property Disclosure form with CASI as an attachment to the Final Report. Ten percent of the project
funds will be withheld until the form is submitted.
PROPOSAL FORMAT
-
Proposal Margin and Spacing Requirements.
1) Proposals must have a minimum 0.75 inch margins at the top, bottom and
on each side.
2) The type size must be clear and readily legible, and conform to the following
three requirements:
- the height of the letters must not be smaller than 10 point
- type density must be no more than 15 characters per 2.5 cm; (for proportional
spacing, the average for any representative section of text must not exceed
15 characters per 2.5 cm
- no more than 6 lines must be within a vertical space of 2.5 cm. The type
size used throughout the proposal must conform to all three requirements.
While line spacing (single-spaced, double-spaced, etc.) is at the discretion
of the proposer, established page limits must be followed.
While the guidelines specified above establish the minimum type size
requirements, PIs are advised that readability is of paramount importance
and should take precedence in selection of an appropriate font for use in
the proposal.
- Cover Page. Must contain the following information in this
order: project title; project duration (one or two years); amount requested;
technology transfer topic number(s) and/or index category to which this proposal
responds; participating university and department; name, title, address, phone
number, and e-mail address of the faculty member; name, title, address, phone
number, and e-mail address (if available) of the collaborating business; and
a 100-word abstract.
- Required Sections of Body. Maximum page length: 5 pages,
excluding references. NOTE: The elements listed in the Proposal
Evaluation section below should serve as guidance in the preparation of these
sections of the body. Please note that the text provided in each section should
pertain to that section and only that section.
- Problem, Background, or Opportunity. Suggested length, 1/2 page.
- Objective. What is the intended outcome of this work? Identify
any deliverables beyond the required reports. Suggested length, 1/2 page.
- Potential for Broad-based Technology Transfer. Suggested length,
1/2 page.
- Approach. What methodology is to be employed? What is the detailed,
step-by-step plan for achieving the objective? Suggested length, 3 pages.
- Resources. What equipment, software, data, knowledge or other
resources are required to achieve your objective, and how are you going
to have access to those resources? Suggested length, 1/2 page.
- Evaluation Plan. How will you assess whether the objective has
been satisfactorily met?
- Appendixes to Proposal
- Vitae. One-page summary vitae for the faculty member, graduate
student (optional), and representative of the Collaborating Company.
- Principal Investigator Disclosure. The principal investigator's
statement as to his/her relationship, if any, to the Collaborating Company.
- Budget. Note: Indirect costs are to be waived by the university.
- Signed Terms and Conditions. Signature is required only for the
principal investigator at the time of proposal submission.
NO other appendices are permitted.
CORPORATE DOCUMENTS
The following two documents, submitted by the Collaborating Company, at
the time of proposal submission:
- Collaborating Company Letter. Letter of intent to participate
and commitment to fund the project. The letter must include:
(a) a statement of commitment to fully fund the project,
(b) a dollar quantitative estimate of the in-kind contribution to
be expected. In-kind contributions include any contribution made by
the company to the project of associated resources (including time of
the individual representing the Collaborating Company, donation of hardware,
software, data or knowledge, use of space, or other resources).
(c) a statement of any proprietary information existing prior to the
project that is to be protected from publication in the final report.
- Signed Collaborating Company Intellectual Property Agreement.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF COLLABORATING COMPANY
The Collaborating Company is required to sign a release for distribution
statement on any project report. It must also provide to CASI an In-kind
Contribution Report in June that states the amount of their in-kind
contributions for the period of the award. The Collaborating Company will
also be asked to write a letter of evaluation after the termination
of the project as to their experience as a Collaborating Company, especially
with regard to technology transfer.
PROPOSAL EVALUATION
Proposals will be evaluated by the CASI Operating Board with respect
to their merit as a university/industry collaboration that realizes both
research interest for a university and practical value for a company.
The proposed work must stand on its own both technically and financially,
and it must be feasible to accomplish it within the scope of the funding
requested.
The existence of related but separately funded research will be considered
favorably in the evaluation of proposals. However, independently funded
work contingent on the award of a CASI grant to a researcher will have no
bearing in proposal evaluation.
REVIEW CRITERIA
- Problem or Opportunity
- Importance of problem or opportunity to Colorado industry.
- Potential of problem or opportunity to further research.
- Objective
- Projects should have realizable, achievable objectives.
- Clarity of objective.
- The degree to which the objective addresses the problem or opportunity
cited.
- Potential for Broad-based Technology Transfer
- The degree to which the achievement of the objective advances technology
transfer in both directions (researcher to company and vice versa).
- The broadness of the range of application if objective is accomplished.
- Approach
- The appropriateness of software technology in the chosen approach.
- The degree to which the approach accomplishes the objective.
- The clarity of the delineation of the steps in the approach.
- The technical merit of the approach.
- The innovativeness of the approach.
- The feasibility of the effort within the time and budget constraints.
- The degree to which the company is involved.
- Evaluation Plan
- Adequacy of the evaluation plan assessment criteria.
- Qualifications of Personnel
- The qualifications of the principal investigator to conduct the
project.
- The appropriateness of the cooperating company representative in
light of the proposed project.
REVIEW PROCESS
UTT proposals are reviewed by a panel of four CASI reviewers, two from
business and two from academia, selected by the CASI director. Copies
of all four reviews are sent to the panel members. A panel session on
the proposal is held two weeks after receipt of the proposal. After discussion
of the individual reviews, a summary recommendation is written, which
is then faxed to the proposer and to the collaborating company. A copy
of the reviews and summary recommendation are mailed to the Operating
Board. The Board members are contacted after one week for their vote and
the result is recorded. The proposers are informed of the result.
FUNDING COMMITMENT
No award shall receive a funding commitment until funds to support the
project have been received by CASI from the Collaborating Company.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS AND CORPORATE DOCUMENTS
All proposals must be approved for submission to CASI by the submitting
university's Office of Sponsored Research. The original and six copies
(total = 7) of proposal, and all Collaborating Company documents should
be sent to the CASI Coordinator's office.
CASI Coordinator's Office
Department of Computer Science
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523
UTT ATTACHMENTS
- Collaborating Company Intellectual
Property Agreement
- UTT Terms and Conditions
Back to
CASI home page.
© Colorado Advanced Software Institute 1996
All material subject to change without notice; last update 30/Sep/01
by CASI Coordinator